Our knowledge of the rich tapestry of ‘men of colour’ who served in the British Army during World War One gets a little bit richer today with three, yes three, new articles by John Ellis about the service of men who were hitherto lost to history.
Pictures of men who served below the rank of officer between 1914 and 1918 are rare as hen’s teeth, we are lucky that the story of one of them featured in newspapers of the time.
Their stories include a court martial, two who were wounded and someone who was discharged as ‘unfit to serve’ because he was suffering from malnutrition.
As promised last week, we can now, courtesy of John Ellis, introduce you to Walter Albert Moore. Some people may still cling to the notion that black soldiers did not serve in front line roles during World War One, Walter’s story provides yet more evidence that nothing could be further from the truth. He served in the Gallipoli campaign (1915-16) and then in Flanders at the Battle of the Somme (1916). Did he survive? Read John’s article to find out!
Before you do though, John’s article prompted me to look at the War Diary of Walter’s battalion for the period he was serving in France during the Battle of the Somme.
We get used to thinking about the shocking carnage of the first day of the battle (around 19,000 British troops lost their lives on that day alone) and on the days that followed. But what we tend to lose sight of is the drip, drip, drip war of attrition in the periods between one ‘big push’ and the next. War diaries will rarely mention the names of rank and file soldiers like Walter whether they were black or white but they do give an impression of what life (and death) was like in the trenches. Here is a short selection of extracts from the War Diary of Walter’s battalion. The diary starts with an account of a night raid on enemy lines:
“4th July, 12.45 am: Party consisted of 70 men and 6 officers which were split up into two parties. Raid was a failure and the officers put down the cause to a certain German listening post. Only the right party got anywhere near the trenches which however they did not penetrate. Casualties in the raiding party were light but there were a good many in the trenches caused by the German artillery retaliation which lasted half an hour. Casualties A Company NIL, B Company OR [other ranks] 1 killed 2 wounded.
A and B companies relieved by C and D companies at almost midnight and returned to huts at COUPIGNY. C Company 200 wounded D Company NIL.”
The troops seem to have then spent a few days out of the front line but there was still business to attend to:
“8th July: temporary commission and appointment of RH McLean, RNVR, Drake Battalion, terminated due to medical unfitness.”
Then they were back in the trenches:
“13th July Lieutenant Commander H B POLLOCK wounded by shrapnel, OR 300 wounded.”
On 18th July, during another respite from the front line, a Field Court Martial was convened and “LS W SMITH was found guilty on three [unspecified] charges and reduced to AB.”
After what seems to have been a quiet period (21st July – “situation quiet throughout”), when a lot of effort went into improving the trenches, the war of attrition continued:
“10th August: Enemy active with LTMs rifle grenades in particular . Two killed.
11th August: Enemy very active in sector with LTMs rifle grenades in particular. One killed three wounded.
12th August: Btn [Battalion] relieved by Hood Btn – Relief complete about 12 midnight. One killed, one wounded.”
The relieved troops marched to Aix Noulette Woods where they spent the next few days ‘in huts’ presumably beyond the reach of German artillery. But they were soon back in the front line.
War diaries are not an easy read in more ways than one
“20th August: A bombardment of gas release started in the ANGRES SECTOR at 10.30 pm which lasted til about 11.45 pm. Some of the enemy retaliation with field guns and trench mortars were [‘was’ has been deleted, grammatical standards must be maintained after all] directed at our Front and Relief lines. Damage slight. Three wounded.
21st August: One wounded.”
And so it continued, the diary reports one killed (22nd August), 23rd August (two wounded), 24th August (two wounded) and, after a brief respite, one killed, one wounded (27th August).
It seems that when you weren’t in the front line being shot at you were behind the lines waiting for your turn to be shot at.
Walter Moore, a black soldier from Trinidad, was part of all this.
Several books have been written about black soldiers in the British Army during World War One, ‘Black Tommies’ by Ray Costello and ‘Black Poppies’ by Stephen Bourne spring immediately to mind, no doubt there have been others. But you can’t help feeling that those books only showed the tip of an iceberg. John Ellis has now turned his attention to the period of the First World War and is uncovering the stories of many more black soldiers.
This picture and headline (‘Coloured men’s response to the new appeal for recruits’) in the ‘Daily Mirror’ of 1st June 1915, caught John’s eye:
Eight Black recruits for the Royal Artillery in 1915 (1)
John writes: “World War One saw thousands of ‘men of colour’ serving in the regiments and corps of the British Army, the Royal Navy and the forces of the Empire. Many of the men were drawn from Britain’s Black population. The men in the photo above volunteered for service in a Territorial regiment of the Royal Artillery in the North of England in 1915.
Two of the men were named by the Newcastle Evening Chronicle, as Ben David and Henry Basker, both Jamaicans.(2) It is not possible to identify either Ben or Henry in the photo, or the names of the other ‘Gunners’. However, a little more is known about Henry Basker.
He was born in Jamaica in 1888 and enlisted in May 1915, when it was noted that he was a seaman by occupation and had a ‘West Indian’ complexion, was 5 ft 5 inches tall, had a chest measurement of 37 inches and good vision.(3) Henry signed up for four years ‘provided His Majesty should so long require your services’ and he swore ‘I will be faithful and bear true Allegiance to His Majesty King George the Fifth.’
His service in the Royal Artillery was brief and he was discharged in Durham in October 1915 after 164 days, ‘his services being no longer required.’ We don’t know why he was discharged, he may well have gone on to serve his country in other ways as he was obviously keen to volunteer. He clearly had a close connection to the North East prior to enlisting because his intended place of residence on discharge was Thrift Street, South Shields, Tynemouth, where his mother, Lucy, lived.”
John and I have both tried to trace ‘Lucy Basker’, so far without success, there is no sign of her in the 1911 census for instance. The presence of black men in South Shields is no surprise, it was a thriving port with a well established black community and it was where Lionel Turpin was living when he enlisted http://historycalroots.com/lionel-fitzherbert-turpin/ . But the presence of Henry’s mother is much more unexpected, if Henry was born in Jamaica in 1888 what was it that brought Lucy to South Shields? We may never know.
The full page from which that item is taken reveals the impact the war was having:
The Daily Mirror, 1st June 1915
The heading ‘Found on the battlefield – do you recognise anyone?’ is heartrending. Especially poignant is the photo at the top left of the page – it has a bullet hole through it. You can’t help but wonder how the young woman in the picture would have felt if she saw it.
This is just a taster, there are more revelations to come from John!
1)Daily Mirror, 1st June 1915. findmypast.co.uk
2)Newcastle Evening Chronicle, 26th July 1915. findmypast.co.uk
3)For Henry Basker see: UK, British Army World War I Pension Records 1914-1920. TNA WO364/172. ancestry.co.uk
We celebrate International Women’s Day 2021 by publishing a new page on our website about Amanda Aldridge. Amanda was born on 10th March and died on the 9th of that month so celebrating her life today is particularly timely.
Lieutenant Colonel Macleod leading the 43rd Light Infantry in the Storming of Badajoz on 6th April 1812 in the Peninsular War. By John Augustus Atkinson
More incredible work by super sleuth John Ellis has now identified 500 individual Black soldiers serving in the British and Irish regiments of the Crown between 1715 and 1860. Among them, two individuals who, had they lived to receive the retrospectively awarded Military General Service Medal 1793-1814 in the late 1840s, would have been two of the most decorated veterans of the Light Division. These men and others like them led incredible lives in the service of the British Crown and yet their names are virtually unknown. Read John’s latest article to find out the full story:
Although the core of it remains unchanged, Audrey Dewjee has updated her article about Nadia Cattouse, adding some additional material and several new photos.
Nadia was thrilled when Audrey told her how much interest the original article generated (well over 2,500 views, including many from Belize, the land of her birth). She was also pleasantly surprised by the larger than usual number of birthday cards she received last November when she celebrated her 96th birthday!
John Ellis has written another article for us, this time about the remarkable life of Thomas Wells.
Thomas was born in Trincomalee, in modern day Sri Lanka. For those who don’t know (and I didn’t until I Googled it), Trincomalee is on the North East coast of Sri Lanka. Now (in pre-Covid times), it largely relies on tourism and modern day visitors are advised that among the ‘awesome’ things to do are: visit the nearby beaches; go whale watching; visit Fort Frederik; or visit the Hindu temple, Koneswaram. But in the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries it was a major port and naval base and was occupied at various times by competing colonial powers, the Portuguese, the Dutch (from 1619), and British, with the French hovering menacingly too.
Thomas was born in about 1755, a time when the Dutch were in town. The Army records that John used to piece together Thomas’s remarkable story, describe him as ‘a black’ and having a ‘black’ complexion. This strongly suggests that neither parent was white.
“Nearly blind” and “Labourer … black”, one of the references to Thomas Wells’ complexion
We can’t know for sure the circumstances that led Thomas to enlist in the British Army but the records show that he served from 1774 and was still on active service in 1809 (in Nova Scotia!). The regiments Thomas was in saw service in Ireland, North America (during the War of Independence), Bermuda, the Bahamas and Canada. Even after he had been pensioned off from the Army and described as ‘nearly blind’ he still managed to enlist on an East India Company ship for a voyage to China.
In the new film version of Wuthering Heights, the fact that Heathcliff is played by a black actor may be more than an example of integrated casting. Portraying him as having African ancestry could be closer to Emily Bronte’s original intention than previous interpretations, where he was often seen as being a Traveller or Gypsy.
Remember how Heathcliff is introduced into the story. Mr. Earnshaw returns from a visit to Liverpool with a child he had seen “starving, and houseless, and as good as dumb in the streets”. He “picked it up and inquired for its owner. Not a soul knew to whom it belonged…and his money and time, being both limited, he thought it better, to take it home with him, at once, than run into vain expenses there; because he was determined he would not leave it as he found it.” Mr. Earnshaw tells his family, “you must…take it as a gift of God; though it’s as dark almost as if it came from the devil” (my italics). Later in the book, Mr. Linton, commenting on Heathcliff’s origins, suggests he could be “a little Lascar, or an American or Spanish castaway”.
As another indication of his possible origins, Emily Bronte gives Heathcliff just one name, which has to serve as both his personal and family name. Having only one name was common for many of the enslaved Africans who came to Britain. Masters were fond of renaming them after classical heroes such as Scipio, Pompey and Caesar, or with place names such as Liverpool, York, Pembroke and Barnard Castle. Some, like Olaudah Equiano, who spent many years named Gustavus Vassa after a Swedish king, managed to reclaim their African names. Emily, who was very well-read, may have been influenced by Equiano’s autobiography, first published in 1797, which played such an important part in the abolition campaign, or she may have heard of the impact Equiano made when he visited Yorkshire on his speaking tours.
What could have given her the idea to place a person of African (or Asian) descent on the moors of Yorkshire? Most likely because she saw, or heard of, such individuals in her daily life. There may have been black workers in the mills of Haworth.
Domestic servants, sailors, mixed-race family members and, I suspect, formerly-enslaved skilled plantation workers (such as millwrights and blacksmiths), made their way to Britain. They settled in Bradford, Leeds, Scarborough and various other towns, as well as villages in the moors and dales, where the Bronte sisters may have encountered them. The sisters could have heard of others in the stories of the locality, at a time when gossip and news
furnished much of country folk’s entertainment. As Charlotte explained, Emily knew the people around her, she “knew their ways, their language, their family histories, she could hear of them with interest, and talk of them with detail, minute, graphic, and accurate” and she was used to “listening to the secret annals of every rude vicinage (i.e. neighbourhood)”. This was the material from which she fashioned her story.
Perhaps she heard about John Yorke “a negro servant belonging to Mr. Hutton,” who was baptised in the parish church of Marske, near Richmond. He saved someone’s life in a fire on the moors and, as a reward for his bravery, he was given a cottage. Having his own home enabled him to marry a local girl and start a family. One of his sons became a noted bare-knuckle boxer; one of his grandsons moved to Bradford in search of work and found it at Bowling Iron Works. Over one hundred and thirty of John Yorke’s descendants are living in Britain today.
The baptismal entry for John Yorke
George Yorke, grandson of John Yorke (courtesy of Jennifer Thornton)
Maybe Emily heard tales of Ira Aldridge, a young African American, whose ambition to be an actor could not have been fulfilled in his native New York. Ira arrived in England about 1823 and a year later he married Margaret Gill, the daughter of a Yorkshire stocking weaver. He toured all over Britain, earning rave reviews wherever he went. Ira Aldridge later took British nationality, achieved star status (and a knighthood) in Europe, and died while on tour in Poland in 1867.
Ira Aldridge in the role of Othello (Manchester Art Gallery)
The first Mrs. Aldridge, née Margaret Gill
Thomas Place inherited his father’s land at Newton-le-Willows, near Bedale. After returning from his Jamaican plantation, William Place arranged for the manumission of his young son, “born of the body of a slave named Sherry Ellis”, and sent for him. This took many months and by the time Thomas arrived his father was dead. However, his aunt, uncle and cousins raised him and Thomas eventually became a farmer near Bishop Auckland.
Thomas Leigh, “a fine sharp boy of colour” aged 9, who had been apprenticed to a chimney sweep, had to be rescued, as he had been very badly treated by his master, whereas Thomas Anson (who may have been a partial inspiration for Heathcliff’s character in the film) liberated himself from enslavement by running away from the Sill family’s farm, high up on the slopes of Whernside.[2]
Runaway notice for Thomas Anson, in Williamson’s Liverpool Advertiser, 8 September, 1758.
The Sill family’s farm from which Thomas Anson made his escape.
Entries in parish registers record a variety of Africans and Asians who were baptised, married or buried in Yorkshire. Henry Osmyn, who was born in India and baptised in York at the age of three, remained in the county, where he also founded a large family.
Although the majority of the people of colour who came here were men, there were women too. Ruth “a native of Hindoostan” (i.e. India) was baptised in Knaresborough in 1820, while Betsy Sawyer, formerly enslaved in Antigua, was buried at Yeadon in 1839, where her gravestone can still be seen.
Betsy Sawyer’s gravestone, mounted on the wall of the Sunday School at Yeadon Methodist Church.
In 1797, Sophia Pierce, “the Black Girl” was sent, among a party of children from Westminster workhouse, to work in the newly built Greenholme Mill at Burley in Wharfedale. However, her career in Yorkshire didn’t last very long as Sophia “did not choose to be employed in the Cotton Works”, and went back to London the following year. Louisa Wild was recorded because she got into trouble with the law. Described as “a girl of colour”, she was charged with being drunk and disorderly at Bradford Court House in January 1839 and committed for a month. “She is the same damsel who a short time ago led the officers of Doncaster a steeple chase, clearing hedges and ditches with the facility of a greyhound, and eventually got clear of them all.” As the person who discovered this newspaper report remarked, nowadays she would probably be in our Olympic team.
These are just a few examples of the real-life people of Asian and African descent living in Yorkshire around the time that Emily Bronte was growing up and creating her masterpiece.
Why would Emily choose a black hero for her powerful love story? Wuthering Heights has been classed as one of the greatest romantic stories in English literature and no-one can fail to be aware of the passion it contains, but it is even more a story of revenge. Heathcliff fully repays those who for years had subjected him to degradation and torment. Coming from a fiercely anti-slavery family, perhaps Emily Bronte was trying to provide a warning of what can happen when such wrongs are heaped upon innocent people – they may acquire warped values and bring about the eventual ruin of their oppressors.
Although first published in 1847, Bronte’s story is set in the years 1801-02, with the narrative ranging backwards as far as 1758. Until the passing of the Act abolishing the shipment of enslaved people across the Atlantic in 1807, buying enslaved Africans and shipping them to the Americas was a legitimate trade for British merchants. After a long and hard-fought campaign by people in and out of Parliament and, not least, by the increasingly successful efforts of the Africans themselves, enslavement in British dominions was finally brought to an end in 1838. However, at the time of the novel’s publication, slavery was still flourishing in both North and South America. It was a big issue for many people in Britain who were involved in campaigns to end it globally and especially in North America where some had kith and kin.
Liverpool had been Britain’s most important slave trading port. In the eighteenth and early nineteenth century, it must have had a sizeable black population. On a visit to the town around 1789, Mary Anne Schimmelpenninck commented, “What surprised me most in the aspect of Liverpool was the multitude of black servants, almost all of whom had originally been slaves”.
African men, women and children were auctioned in Liverpool from time to time, for example eight people from the ship Thomas (3 men, 2 women, 2 boys and a girl) were put up for sale at the Customs House in 1766. Black sailors, from the Caribbean as well as Africa, were employed on board British ships, to replace the many white crew members who had died or deserted while abroad. Even greater numbers of sailors were recruited in India. Known as Lascars, they were less likely to be integrated into existing crews because of language obstacles. Ruled over by a bilingual serang, they usually remained apart, and thus were more easily exploited and underpaid. Liverpool became home to seafarers from both groups and it is therefore not surprising that there could have been black or mixed-race children among the many street-urchins who tried to stay alive on the city’s streets.
For over a hundred years, British merchants from ports such as Liverpool and Lancaster had purchased people in Africa and taken them to the Caribbean and North America where they could be tortured and worked to death on sugar and tobacco plantations, or in growing an abundance of other crops such as coffee, cotton, rice and arrowroot.
These crops were then shipped back to Britain on the third leg of a journey which, if the ship arrived safely, could net its owners a very handsome profit. Golden opportunities existed for adventurous spirits, the poverty stricken, or those who needed to leave the country for a while to escape various forms of trouble. Although many would perish from shipwreck or war or the ever-present menace of tropical diseases, some became rich as a result and a number managed to return to their native land.
Yorkshiremen from towns and cities and from the remotest corners of the dales went to seek their fortunes in this new world. Charles Inman, a man who was in line to inherit family property, chose to go to Lancaster to be apprenticed to a merchant. From there he went to Jamaica, where he died in 1767. His family in Nidderdale inherited his wealth. Henry Foster from Oughtershaw in remote Langstrothdale and John Sill of Dent both went to Jamaica, while George Kearton from Oxnop Hall in the wilds of Swaledale chose to establish an arrowroot plantation on the island of St. Vincent. When George Metcalfe retired to Hawes, he still held large sugar estates in Dominica and Demerara (now Guyana).
George Metcalfe’s gravestone, Hawes Churchyard, Wensleydale. (Dales Countryside Museum, Hawes)
Many of those who became owners of, or workers on, plantations, fathered children with enslaved African women, regardless of whether they had a white wife and family with them or back at home.
When planters and their families returned to Britain on a visit or for good, they often brought enslaved Africans with them to look after their needs en route in order to make the long, arduous voyage more bearable. The same was true for those who went to India to seek their fortunes as traders or soldiers. They too fathered children with Indian women, and brought servants back with them; whilst men from both groups sent their mixed-race children to attend schools in Yorkshire.
Emily Bronte would have been well-aware of such facts. Intending to set her readers thinking, she shrouded Heathcliff’s origins in mystery. In portraying Heathcliff as a man of African descent, Andrea Arnold, the director of the new film, has chosen a plausible, if less-familiar, interpretation of his background. In so doing she has rendered a valuable service, by reminding us of an inter-racial British past which is, too often, overlooked.
[1]BASA Newsletter – BASA, the Black and Asian Studies Association (originally known as ASACACHIB – Association for the Study of African, Caribbean and Asian Culture and History in Britain), published a thrice-yearly journal which was full of interesting articles by a wide variety of writers on a hugely diverse range of topics. It also included snippets of information about Black and Asian people in Britain over many centuries, which could then be followed up by anyone interested in pursuing their stories. Several of the later issues of the Newsletter are available online at http://www.blackandasianstudies.org/newsletter_newsletter-html
Regular contributor, John Ellis, has taken a break from discovering Black sailors at the Battle of Trafalgar, to unearth the sad story of Richard Umhala, the son of an African Prince, who died, aged just 8, in Bradford in 1848. Read John’s article to find out how Richard came to be in Bradford http://historycalroots.com/a-great-favourite-with-both-officers-and-men-richard-umhala-an-african-prince-in-victorian-bradford and why he is buried over 6,000 miles from his birthplace (and, given that Richard would have made much of his journey by sea, the actual distance he traveled would have been far greater).
